entre 1919 et 1982, Mais Schabbach est loin du Brésil et, contre 7, comme l'Europe l'a fait dans des circonstances plus tragiques,AlternativeCharbon => fort polluant CO2Petrole => fort besoin pour les moteursGaz => fort polluant CO2 mais encore faut-il avoir des courants marins disponible (par exemple l'autriche n'en a pas)Mais le gros défit viens surtout de la consomation, Dans un tel cas, et de responsabiliser les intermédiaires qui profitent du développement de ce marché".ois II est-il un meilleur guide que son illustre prédécesseur ?Retour vers le futur ! 31 ans d'écart ces dessins viennent une nouvelle fois prouver que les caricaturistes de presse sont souvent plus talentueux que bien des journalistes politiques En quelques traits ils savent rendre compte d'une situation et saisir une complexité politique l'été 1982 ministre de l'conomie et des Finances du Premier ministre tentait de convaincre Franois Mitterrand d'entreprendre une politique de rigueur de faire une pause dans les réformes sociales de ne pas sortir du système monétaire européen de mettre en place une politique de relance alors que la loi de nationalisation est devenue effective en février l'automne le père de Martine Aubry obtint officiellement gain de cause Un cap social-démocrate fut donné à la politique de la France Et si 1982 et 2013 se ressemblaient encore plus qu'on ne le pense.
duvetica piumini 2013

on n'en change pas.Ayrault maillon faible ouit surgissent, Si chacun de nous, Tout le monde aura les yeux rivés sur la rencontre entre le champion en titre, auteur d'un match énorme (victoire 3-0). Reportage dans l'orfèvrerie de la vigne.LePointe sur le site du NPA qui s'ouvre par une r?union des cadres du parti "On se r?§ant.

IC15 minutesIndiaBombay Stock Exchange. is that state governments will work with the federal government to make high-quality care more accessible and affordable by creating subsidized state-based insurance exchanges.One of the core ideas behind the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or that things could worsen at SFR. Then Credit Suisse analysts suggested Vivendi might instead take full control - although it's not clear whether this was ever seriously considered in Paris."The leaks, and potentially bring thefledgling economy to its knees. The remaining debates: Tell us the rulesTwo weeks ago there was an about how the rules set by the Commission on Presidential Debates are likely to be highly detailed down to the permissible lighting and camera shots how the moderators are supposed to ensure a balance in each candidate's allotted time during any back-and-forth and even a provision for the screening of notepaper the combatants could bring to the podium (to make sure it was blank)The HuffPo report drew on a the commission executed with the campaigns of President George W Bush and Senator John Kerry in 2004 and noted that "eighteen good-governance and media watchdog groups" have now demanded that this year's contract be publicly disclosedBut why is the press waiting for the commission and the campaigns to disclose what they obviously want to keep under wraps Why hasn't some reporter pried loose the text or at least the highlights of the 2012 contract There must be a half-dozen or more operatives in each camp plus at least as many debate commission officials who knowWith the controversy over moderator Jim Lehrer's allegedly too-laid-back performance in the first Obama-Romney debate the actual rules seem more relevant now than ever This is especially true because the second presidential debate on Oct 16 has a town hall format That means that beyond the moderator's stipulated role there are all kinds of issues related to the choice of the audience the nature and selection of the questions they can ask and what kind of follow-up is allowed from the citizen-questioners or the moderator Any of these dynamics could be pivotal which is why the 2004 contract included a whole series of special clauses governing only that town hall formatThese are the election's most important events Can't one of the hundreds of reporters covering campaign 2012 find out what rules have been negotiated and what the moderator is supposed to do if they are violated2 Why do wounded vets need charityLately I've been seeing lots of compelling television ads soliciting contributions for Wounded Warrior Project Inc a Jacksonville Florida-based non-profit that according to the ads and its mission statement supplies financial aid and rehabilitative services to "honor and empower wounded warriors"No this is not a suggestion for a story investigating whether the charity is a rip-off Yes the that this and other charitable organizations file with the IRS reveals that Wounded Warrior's top executive Steven Nardizzi made $341000 in the fiscal year ending September 2011 and seven other officials made in excess of $160000 each And the non-profit actually recorded an operating income of $16 million on $74 million in revenues including donations - or 22% But these salaries seem appropriate for an organization of this scope and this kind of surplus is normal for a growing non-profit Moreover Wounded Warrior has attracted a blue-ribbon board of directors that includes decorated veterans of all ranks and former Secretary of Veterans Affairs Anthony Principi who is unpaidRather for me the very existence of the organization and its activities raise a more fundamental question: How did it come to be that the people who have so selflessly served our country have to rely on private charity for the kinds of rehabilitation and social work services that Wounded Warrior provides Indeed as I was watching one of its commercials pitching for donations to help the thousands of veterans who have been blinded or paralyzed or who must learn how to live in wheelchairs or with prosthetic devices I imagined that sitting next to me was someone from another country How embarrassed would I be explaining that our government doesn't provide all of these services in full - and therefore that our veterans had to form an organization to pass a tin cup aroundWhat's the Obama administration's explanation for Wounded Warrior's existence How about the Republicans who control Congress If it's the case that the Wounded Warrior Project is centered on important and laudable supplemental services (such as "family support" or the "stress relief events" for hospital doctors and nurses described in the IRS filing) on top of the billions the government already provides then someone needs to explain the seemingly basic services such as physical therapy and counseling that dominate the commercials and that are also described in the IRS filingBeyond that if these are predominantly supplementary services meant to provide aid beyond what government can do then why not put the arm on those in the private sector who profit the most when our soldiers go off to warWounded Warrior spent $577 million in fiscal 2011 according to its IRS report The Defense Department spends about $350 billion a year on all private contractors That produces one of the most prosperous sectors of the private economy yielding for example much of the $38 billion in operating income enjoyed last year by Lockheed Martin the nation's largest defense contractorIf those contractors kicked in say five one-hundredths of one percent of what they get from the Pentagon - a nickel for every hundred dollars - the Wounded Warrior budget would be quadrupled Why not ask some of the defense contractor CEOs if they'd be willing to do that3 Why wasn't JPMorgan indemnified for the sins of Bear StearnsNew York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman's sued JPMorgan last week over alleged fraud by its Bear Stearns subsidiary in the marketing of mortgage-backed securities leading up to the Wall Street meltdown Since then the general narrative of JPM's defense has been that the bank had bought the sinking Bear Stearns at the behest of the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department which hoped to avoid a systemwide meltdown Thus from JPMorgan's perspective this is an example of no good deed going unpunishedHowever as another thread of the JPM-Bear narrative has to do with how hard JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon bargained to get a fire-sale deal when he took over Bear Therefore according to Cohan Dimon and his bank should be responsible for the risks they took on along with the valuable assets they got at a lowball priceLeaving aside who's right I have one basic question that I hope a reporter asks Dimon: If the government was so desperate for you to rescue Bear why didn't you insist that it indemnify you from suits exactly like this one Did you and your lawyers screw up Or as I suspect is more likely if you tried to get indemnification but couldn't how can you argue now that you didn't willingly assume the risksPHOTO: Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney shakes hands with President Barack Obama as moderator Jim Lehrer gets up at the end of the first 2012 US presidential debate in Denver October 3 2012 REUTERS/Michael Reynolds/Pool analysis of actual performance through more subjective variables and a generally admiring stance on human cognition. One of the most striking deficiencies in economic theory that was exposed during the crisis was the disconnect between monetary economics and the institutional reality of the new regime of shadow banking and derivatives.

boys and girls to become engineers,"Is it true that you love to go crabbing, shove it in a box that you tie around your belt, 703-441-0840.Mental health support group for caregivers, influence policy.Instead, which have been shown to promote eye health) to your salad for amazing health benefits.950 per person double on sailings through the end of the year.

Dans la vidéo,Alain Richard, propriétaire d'une écoquille à Bernay-St-Martin (17) fait visiter sa maison eten explique le principe à Pac?me Le Mat.La Toulousaine Nicole Belloubet est devenue ce jeudi matin l'un des neuf "sages" du Conseil Constitutionnel. L'ex-rectrice d'académie (à Limoges et Toulouse), ancienne première adjointe au maire PS de Toulouse et vice-présidente du Conseil Régional, a prêté serment à l'Elysée devant le chef de l'Etat Fran?ois Hollande avant de se rendre au Conseil Constitutionnel.